Solana validator network report

Solana Validator Data Centers and ASN Report

Compare Solana validator stake by canonical data center provider, autonomous system number, and network organization aliases.

Data source

Solana Gossip + vote accounts

Updated Jul 13, 2026, 06:23 AM UTC

Network operators

76

28%

Autonomous systems

87

28%

Top data center

28%

TeraSwitch Networks

28%

Geolocated

711/715

100%

100%

Network intelligence

Network state, leader timing, and validator evidence in one report.

This panel adds live slot context, leader-window evidence, validator performance rows, and production samples to the existing reports without pretending unsupported data is already resolved.

leader window loadingperformance loading

Current slot

-

Leader feed loading · updated waiting

Observed slot time

-

Target 400 ms · epoch - complete

Transaction sample

-

- non-vote · - vote

Leader production sample

-

- scheduled · - skipped · skip -

Leader now

Resolving leader

Waiting for leader window

Slot

-

Window

-

Next different leader

Waiting for next leader group

Network activity evidence

Non-vote transactions

-

Vote transactions

-

Performance rows

-

Top countries by stake

Country-level stake concentration across geolocated validators.

0-100%
01

Germany

154 validators

25.5%
02

Netherlands

107 validators

18.6%
03

United States

145 validators

16.9%
0410.9%
05

Japan

75 validators

5.8%
06

Singapore

56 validators

4.8%
07

Canada

17 validators

4.6%
08

Lithuania

15 validators

4.6%
09

Ireland

8 validators

2%
10

Sweden

10 validators

1.7%
11

France

13 validators

1%
120.7%
13

Brazil

17 validators

0.6%
140.5%
15

Czechia

3 validators

0.3%
160.3%
17

Poland

7 validators

0.3%
18

Slovakia

3 validators

0.2%
20

Russia

4 validators

0.1%
21

Norway

4 validators

0.1%
22

Mexico

2 validators

0.1%
23

Spain

1 validators

0.1%
24

Romania

3 validators

0.1%
25

Austria

1 validators

0.1%
26

Argentina

2 validators

0.1%
27

Luxembourg

1 validators

0%
28

Latvia

2 validators

0%
29

Bulgaria

1 validators

0%
30

Finland

2 validators

0%

Top network operators

Network organization concentration beyond country and city labels.

0-100%
01

TeraSwitch Networks

94 validators

28%
02

UAB Cherry Servers

74 validators

12.6%
03

Latitude.sh

120 validators

10.9%
04

ALLNODES

71 validators

6.6%
05

OVH SAS

33 validators

6%
06

Servers.com, Inc.

24 validators

4.8%
07

Amazon.com

6 validators

4.4%
08

Helius

2 validators

3.9%
09

Galaxy Digital LP

5 validators

3%
102.8%
11

Payward, Inc.

2 validators

2.3%
12

Datacamp Limited

10 validators

1.9%
13

RETN Limited

2 validators

1.7%
14

HIVELOCITY, Inc.

13 validators

1.5%
160.8%
19

WebNX, Inc.

17 validators

0.6%
200.5%
21

HOSTKEY B.V.

1 validators

0.5%
22

Butterfly Research

6 validators

0.4%
230.3%
24

synlinq.de

9 validators

0.3%
250.3%
260.3%
27

23M GmbH

7 validators

0.2%
28

VNET a.s.

3 validators

0.2%
29

Decentra Cloud

10 validators

0.2%
30

FiberState, LLC

4 validators

0.2%

Top autonomous systems

ASN-level stake concentration after provider alias normalization.

0-100%
01

AS20326 TeraSwitch Networks

94 validators

28%
02

AS396356 Latitude.sh

98 validators

8.6%
03

AS395201 ALLNODES

71 validators

6.6%
04

AS16276 OVH SAS

33 validators

6%
05

AS7979 Servers.com, Inc.

24 validators

4.8%
06

AS16125 UAB Cherry Servers

15 validators

4.6%
07

AS399460 Helius

2 validators

3.9%
08

AS213896 UAB Cherry Servers

11 validators

3.2%
09

AS400963 Galaxy Digital LP

5 validators

3%
10

AS20473 The Constant Company, LLC

72 validators

2.8%
11

AS14618 Amazon.com

1 validators

2.8%
12

AS1072 Payward, Inc.

2 validators

2.3%
13

AS262287 Latitude.sh

22 validators

2.3%
14

AS60068 Datacamp Limited

10 validators

1.9%
15

AS9002 RETN Limited

2 validators

1.7%
16

AS214159 UAB Cherry Servers

9 validators

1.7%
17

AS16509 Amazon.com

5 validators

1.6%
18

AS29802 HIVELOCITY, Inc.

13 validators

1.5%
19

AS204770 UAB Cherry Servers

15 validators

1.3%
20

AS59642 UAB Cherry Servers

7 validators

1.3%
21

AS29066 velia.net Internetdienste GmbH

12 validators

1%
22

AS206264 Amarutu Technology Ltd

29 validators

0.8%
23

AS45102 Alibaba (US) Technology Co., Ltd.

3 validators

0.8%
24

AS214783 Danny Nieuwenhuis trading as DedicatedNodes

9 validators

0.7%
25

AS18450 WebNX, Inc.

17 validators

0.6%
26

AS57043 HOSTKEY B.V.

1 validators

0.5%
27

AS3402 Butterfly Research

6 validators

0.4%
28

AS210162 UAB Cherry Servers

9 validators

0.4%
29

AS6939 Hurricane Electric LLC

1 validators

0.3%
30

AS44486 synlinq.de

9 validators

0.3%

Data center ranking

Provider aliases are normalized before grouping; the ASN view keeps AS-level rows separate.

RankProviderASNsPopulationDelinquentActive stake
01

Key signal

Provider normalization

Raw network organization labels are grouped into canonical providers so TeraSwitch, Cherry Servers, and similar aliases are counted together.

02

Key signal

ASN concentration

Autonomous system rankings show where stake is concentrated at the routing and network ownership layer.

03

Key signal

Infrastructure risk

Provider and ASN views make it easier to spot dependencies that are not visible from country or city labels alone.

01

What this report answers

This page helps delegators, validators, RPC teams, and researchers compare Solana validator data center providers, ASNs, and raw network organization aliases in one current ranking.

02

How to read the data

Validators Solutions starts from Solana Gossip network organization metadata, extracts AS numbers when present, and applies provider aliases before ranking by validator count or active stake.

03

How operators use it

Infrastructure teams can use the provider view to avoid excessive reliance on one hosting group, then switch to ASN ranking to inspect routing-layer concentration.