Validators Solutions

Solana validator network report

Solana Validator Countries Report

Explore Solana validator country and city distribution, network operator concentration, and geographic decentralization context.

Data source

Solana Gossip + vote accounts

Updated Oct 02, 2026, 05:06 PM UTC

Countries

31

34.7%

Cities

88

28.7%

Network operators

75

29.1%

Geolocated

681/684

100%

100%

Network intelligence

Network state, leader timing, and validator evidence in one report.

This panel adds live slot context, leader-window evidence, validator performance rows, and production samples to the existing reports without pretending unsupported data is already resolved.

leader window loadingperformance loading

Current slot

-

Leader feed loading · updated waiting

Observed slot time

-

Target 400 ms · epoch - complete

Transaction sample

-

- non-vote · - vote

Leader production sample

-

- scheduled · - skipped · skip -

Leader now

Resolving leader

Waiting for leader window

Slot

-

Window

-

Next different leader

Waiting for next leader group

Network activity evidence

Non-vote transactions

-

Vote transactions

-

Performance rows

-

Top countries by stake

Country-level stake concentration across geolocated validators.

0-100%
01

Germany

190 validators

34.7%
02

Netherlands

121 validators

19.4%
03

United States

121 validators

15%
04

United Kingdom

33 validators

9.4%
05

Japan

54 validators

5.7%
06

Lithuania

17 validators

4.5%
07

Singapore

45 validators

4.1%
08

Sweden

10 validators

1.9%
09

Ireland

6 validators

1.3%
10

France

11 validators

1%
11

Hong Kong SAR China

15 validators

0.6%
12

Switzerland

1 validators

0.5%
13

Canada

11 validators

0.4%
14

Brazil

13 validators

0.3%
15

South Korea

1 validators

0.3%
16

Poland

7 validators

0.2%
17

Slovakia

3 validators

0.2%
18

Norway

3 validators

0.1%
19

Mexico

2 validators

0.1%
20

Spain

1 validators

0.1%
21

Albania

2 validators

0.1%
22

Romania

2 validators

0.1%
23

Austria

1 validators

0.1%
24

Luxembourg

1 validators

0%
25

Russia

2 validators

0%
26

Latvia

2 validators

0%
27

Argentina

1 validators

0%
28

Bulgaria

1 validators

0%
29

Czechia

1 validators

0%
30

Ukraine

1 validators

0%

Top cities by stake

City-level clusters that can affect infrastructure diversity.

0-100%
01

Frankfurt am Main

113 validators

28.7%
02

Amsterdam

77 validators

13.2%
03

London

26 validators

8.9%
04

Tokyo

46 validators

4.9%
05

Lelystad

24 validators

4.5%
06

Šiauliai

17 validators

4.5%
07

Singapore

45 validators

4.1%
08

Ashburn

4 validators

2.8%
09

New York City

17 validators

2.7%
10

Eschborn

36 validators

2.5%
11

Offenbach

35 validators

2.4%
12

Los Angeles

18 validators

2.1%
13

Stockholm

10 validators

1.9%
14

Newark

9 validators

1.7%
15

Chicago

22 validators

1.3%
16

Boardman

1 validators

1.3%
17

Crumlin

3 validators

1.2%
18

Rüsselsheim am Main

2 validators

0.9%
19

Rotterdam

8 validators

0.9%
20

Sterling

4 validators

0.8%
21

Ebara

5 validators

0.6%
22

Woerden

7 validators

0.6%
23

Aubervilliers

2 validators

0.6%
24

Zürich

1 validators

0.5%
25

Leesburg

2 validators

0.5%
26

Tsuen Wan

11 validators

0.4%
27

Bexley

4 validators

0.3%
28

São Paulo

13 validators

0.3%
29

San Jose

1 validators

0.3%
30

Dallas

7 validators

0.3%

Top network operators

Network organization concentration beyond country and city labels.

0-100%
01

TeraSwitch Networks

95 validators

29.1%
02

UAB Cherry Servers

85 validators

13.1%
03

Latitude.sh

109 validators

12.3%
04

ALLNODES

81 validators

7.1%
05

OVH SAS

30 validators

6%
06

Servers.com, Inc.

21 validators

4.7%
07

Amazon.com

6 validators

4.3%
08

Galaxy Digital LP

5 validators

3.3%
09

Payward, Inc.

2 validators

2.9%
10

The Constant Company, LLC

46 validators

1.9%
11

Datacamp Limited

8 validators

1.8%
12

RETN Limited

2 validators

1.6%
13

Danny Nieuwenhuis trading as DedicatedNodes

17 validators

1.5%
14

Alibaba (US) Technology Co., Ltd.

4 validators

1.1%
15

velia.net Internetdienste GmbH

11 validators

0.9%
16

Limestone Networks, Inc.

3 validators

0.8%
17

Amarutu Technology Ltd

26 validators

0.7%
18

Twinstake Limited

1 validators

0.6%
19

HIVELOCITY, Inc.

9 validators

0.6%
20

WebNX, Inc.

15 validators

0.6%
21

Decentra Cloud

12 validators

0.5%
22

HOSTKEY B.V.

1 validators

0.5%
23

Hurricane Electric LLC

2 validators

0.4%
24

synlinq.de

11 validators

0.3%
25

SK Broadband Co Ltd

1 validators

0.3%
26

Butterfly Research

3 validators

0.3%
27

VNET a.s.

3 validators

0.2%
28

23M GmbH

7 validators

0.2%
29

Momentum Telecom, Inc.

2 validators

0.2%
30

Arelion Sweden AB

3 validators

0.2%
01

Key signal

Country distribution

Country-level aggregation shows where validators and active stake are visibly concentrated across the network.

02

Key signal

City clusters

City and region clusters help separate healthy geographic presence from excessive reliance on a few locations.

03

Key signal

Network operators

Organization and ASN-style metadata adds another layer beyond country names when evaluating infrastructure diversity.

01

What this report answers

This page helps delegators, RPC teams, and researchers compare Solana validator countries, city concentration, and infrastructure diversity. Use the live validator table to filter the current country, region, city, and network rows.

02

How to read the data

Validators Solutions uses Solana Gossip and vote-account context to attach country, region, city, version, and network organization metadata to validator rows. Unknown or low-confidence locations should be treated carefully rather than turned into separate indexable pages.

03

How operators use it

Delegators can use geography to support underrepresented regions. RPC, stream, and application teams can use it to reason about placement, route quality, and whether infrastructure decisions are too dependent on one country, city, or network operator.