Validators Solutions

Solana validator network report

Solana Validator Countries Report

Explore Solana validator country and city distribution, network operator concentration, and geographic decentralization context.

Data source

Solana Gossip + vote accounts

Updated Jul 13, 2026, 06:23 AM UTC

Countries

30

25.5%

Cities

88

19.9%

Network operators

76

28%

Geolocated

711/715

100%

100%

Network intelligence

Network state, leader timing, and validator evidence in one report.

This panel adds live slot context, leader-window evidence, validator performance rows, and production samples to the existing reports without pretending unsupported data is already resolved.

leader window loadingperformance loading

Current slot

-

Leader feed loading · updated waiting

Observed slot time

-

Target 400 ms · epoch - complete

Transaction sample

-

- non-vote · - vote

Leader production sample

-

- scheduled · - skipped · skip -

Leader now

Resolving leader

Waiting for leader window

Slot

-

Window

-

Next different leader

Waiting for next leader group

Network activity evidence

Non-vote transactions

-

Vote transactions

-

Performance rows

-

Top countries by stake

Country-level stake concentration across geolocated validators.

0-100%
01

Germany

154 validators

25.5%
02

Netherlands

107 validators

18.6%
03

United States

145 validators

16.9%
04

United Kingdom

34 validators

10.9%
05

Japan

75 validators

5.8%
06

Singapore

56 validators

4.8%
07

Canada

17 validators

4.6%
08

Lithuania

15 validators

4.6%
09

Ireland

8 validators

2%
10

Sweden

10 validators

1.7%
11

France

13 validators

1%
12

Hong Kong SAR China

20 validators

0.7%
13

Brazil

17 validators

0.6%
14

Switzerland

1 validators

0.5%
15

Czechia

3 validators

0.3%
16

South Korea

1 validators

0.3%
17

Poland

7 validators

0.3%
18

Slovakia

3 validators

0.2%
19

United Arab Emirates

2 validators

0.2%
20

Russia

4 validators

0.1%
21

Norway

4 validators

0.1%
22

Mexico

2 validators

0.1%
23

Spain

1 validators

0.1%
24

Romania

3 validators

0.1%
25

Austria

1 validators

0.1%
26

Argentina

2 validators

0.1%
27

Luxembourg

1 validators

0%
28

Latvia

2 validators

0%
29

Bulgaria

1 validators

0%
30

Finland

2 validators

0%

Top cities by stake

City-level clusters that can affect infrastructure diversity.

0-100%
01

Frankfurt am Main

93 validators

19.9%
02

Amsterdam

65 validators

13.8%
03

London

25 validators

10.4%
04

Singapore

56 validators

4.8%
05

Šiauliai

15 validators

4.6%
06

Toronto

13 validators

4.5%
07

Lelystad

29 validators

4.5%
08

Ashburn

5 validators

3%
09

Los Angeles

25 validators

3%
10

New York City

16 validators

2.4%
11

Offenbach

32 validators

2.4%
12

Eschborn

23 validators

2.1%
13

Ebara

9 validators

2%
14

Tokyo

60 validators

1.9%
15

Chicago

23 validators

1.9%
16

Monzen-nakachō

3 validators

1.7%
17

Stockholm

10 validators

1.7%
18

Newark

11 validators

1.5%
19

Boardman

1 validators

1.3%
20

Crumlin

4 validators

1.2%
21

Rüsselsheim am Main

1 validators

0.8%
22

Sterling

4 validators

0.8%
23

Dublin

4 validators

0.8%
24

Aubervilliers

4 validators

0.6%
25

São Paulo

16 validators

0.5%
26

Zürich

1 validators

0.5%
27

Tung Chung

9 validators

0.5%
28

Leesburg

1 validators

0.4%
29

Salt Lake City

8 validators

0.3%
30

Bexley

5 validators

0.3%

Top network operators

Network organization concentration beyond country and city labels.

0-100%
01

TeraSwitch Networks

94 validators

28%
02

UAB Cherry Servers

74 validators

12.6%
03

Latitude.sh

120 validators

10.9%
04

ALLNODES

71 validators

6.6%
05

OVH SAS

33 validators

6%
06

Servers.com, Inc.

24 validators

4.8%
07

Amazon.com

6 validators

4.4%
08

Helius

2 validators

3.9%
09

Galaxy Digital LP

5 validators

3%
10

The Constant Company, LLC

72 validators

2.8%
11

Payward, Inc.

2 validators

2.3%
12

Datacamp Limited

10 validators

1.9%
13

RETN Limited

2 validators

1.7%
14

HIVELOCITY, Inc.

13 validators

1.5%
15

velia.net Internetdienste GmbH

12 validators

1%
16

Amarutu Technology Ltd

29 validators

0.8%
17

Alibaba (US) Technology Co., Ltd.

3 validators

0.8%
18

Danny Nieuwenhuis trading as DedicatedNodes

9 validators

0.7%
19

WebNX, Inc.

17 validators

0.6%
20

RockawayX Infra s.r.o.

4 validators

0.5%
21

HOSTKEY B.V.

1 validators

0.5%
22

Butterfly Research

6 validators

0.4%
23

Hurricane Electric LLC

1 validators

0.3%
24

synlinq.de

9 validators

0.3%
25

SK Broadband Co Ltd

1 validators

0.3%
26

Limestone Networks, Inc.

2 validators

0.3%
27

23M GmbH

7 validators

0.2%
28

VNET a.s.

3 validators

0.2%
29

Decentra Cloud

10 validators

0.2%
30

FiberState, LLC

4 validators

0.2%
01

Key signal

Country distribution

Country-level aggregation shows where validators and active stake are visibly concentrated across the network.

02

Key signal

City clusters

City and region clusters help separate healthy geographic presence from excessive reliance on a few locations.

03

Key signal

Network operators

Organization and ASN-style metadata adds another layer beyond country names when evaluating infrastructure diversity.

01

What this report answers

This page helps delegators, RPC teams, and researchers compare Solana validator countries, city concentration, and infrastructure diversity. Use the live validator table to filter the current country, region, city, and network rows.

02

How to read the data

Validators Solutions uses Solana Gossip and vote-account context to attach country, region, city, version, and network organization metadata to validator rows. Unknown or low-confidence locations should be treated carefully rather than turned into separate indexable pages.

03

How operators use it

Delegators can use geography to support underrepresented regions. RPC, stream, and application teams can use it to reason about placement, route quality, and whether infrastructure decisions are too dependent on one country, city, or network operator.